Columbia Science Review
  • Home
  • About
    • Executive Board
    • Editorial Board
  • Blog
  • Events
    • 2022-2023
    • 2021-2022
    • 2020-2021
    • 2019-2020
    • 2018-2019
    • 2017-2018
    • 2016-2017
  • Publications
  • COVID-19 Public Hub
    • Interviews >
      • Biology of COVID-19
      • Public Health
      • Technology & Data
    • Frontline Stories >
      • Healthcare Workers
      • Global Health
      • Volunteer Efforts
    • Resources & Links >
      • FAQ's
      • Resource Hubs
      • Student Opportunities
      • Podcasts & Graphics
      • Mental Health Resources
      • Twitter Feeds
      • BLM Resources
    • Columbia Events >
      • Campus Events
      • CUMC COVID-19 Symposium
      • CSR Events
    • Our Team
  • Contact

A Bite into Genetically-Engineered Vaccines

11/17/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Illustration by Lizka Vaintrob
By Angela Mu

As the weather begins to cool and flu season kicks into action, you might notice an increased appearance of sharp syringe needles, dreaded nasal sprays, or perhaps even terrified little kids lining up to receive their shots. This is a time of discomfort for the countless individuals who view immunizations as invasive, painful, or simply bothersome. For these people, receiving oral vaccines may be much more convenient and less nerve-wracking.

First introduced in 1990, edible vaccines are typically composed of plants that have been genetically engineered to trigger a response within a person’s immune system after consumption. Unlike traditional vaccines, which directly inject antigens (usually weakened versions of disease-causing pathogens), this method of vaccination introduces them to the human body through genetically modified plants that contain the target antigens. 

As an indirect process of producing target antigens in plant tissue, Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer involves the use of naturally occuring bacteria from soil, which normally infect plants with a tumor-inducing gene. However, by genetically engineering the bacteria, the tumor-inducing gene can be replaced with the desired gene capable of immunization stimulation.

Direct processes such as gene-gun delivery can also be used to insert target genes into plants. Using a particle gun, microparticles can be accelerated, enabling them to penetrate plant tissue where they can release genes that will be incorporated into the plant’s own genome. As a direct result, the plant can produce the antigen to help confer immunity and act as a vaccine.

Once the edible vaccine is consumed, the outer plant wall acts as a shield to prevent stomach acids and digestive enzymes from breaking down the antigen. The antigen can then be delivered to the linings of the digestive tract to be properly absorbed and able to begin stimulating the production of antibodies. Moreover, this oral delivery method can actually offer a higher level of protection than traditional vaccines, as the gastrointestinal linings that the vaccine encounters are the body’s first line of defense where infections are generally initiated. 

As a cost-effective immunization method, edible vaccines would be especially life-changing for individuals living in developing countries that face vaccine shortages for fatal diseases such as malaria. In these countries, the delivery and administration of traditional vaccines are also hindered by issues concerning refrigeration, transportation costs, and improper needle sterilization, which frequently lead to infection. Cultivating plant vaccines that have the ability to reproduce plants containing the target antigens would allow vaccines to become much more accessible to insufficiently supplied countries and general populations at large. 

Already, researchers such as Dr. Charles Arntzen from Arizona State University have been genetically modifying potatoes, tobacco, and tomatoes to contain antigens that may elicit immunity for diseases like malaria and hepatitis B. 

Nonetheless, there are concerns regarding the administration of edible vaccines. Determining the appropriate dosage may be difficult since produce can vary greatly in size. Additionally, edible vaccines must be consumed raw in order to remain effective, but few would find raw potatoes to be particularly appetizing. Even beyond these matters, general health concerns surrounding the consumption of genetically modified organisms may further deter people from consuming edible vaccines.

The future of edible vaccines, however, still appears to be extremely promising. With researchers investigating new methods of production, such as  alterations of a wider variety of plants and the development of plant vaccines in the form of a powder that has a more consistent potency. Who knows, in the future, when you are due for your next flu shot, maybe all you’ll need to do is to take a bite out of your favorite fruit or vegetable.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Artificial Intelligence
    Halloween 2022

    Archives

    November 2022
    October 2022
    June 2022
    January 2022
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    July 2009
    May 2009

Columbia Science Review
© COPYRIGHT 2022. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Photos used under Creative Commons from driver Photographer, BrevisPhotography, digitalbob8, Rennett Stowe, Kristine Paulus
  • Home
  • About
    • Executive Board
    • Editorial Board
  • Blog
  • Events
    • 2022-2023
    • 2021-2022
    • 2020-2021
    • 2019-2020
    • 2018-2019
    • 2017-2018
    • 2016-2017
  • Publications
  • COVID-19 Public Hub
    • Interviews >
      • Biology of COVID-19
      • Public Health
      • Technology & Data
    • Frontline Stories >
      • Healthcare Workers
      • Global Health
      • Volunteer Efforts
    • Resources & Links >
      • FAQ's
      • Resource Hubs
      • Student Opportunities
      • Podcasts & Graphics
      • Mental Health Resources
      • Twitter Feeds
      • BLM Resources
    • Columbia Events >
      • Campus Events
      • CUMC COVID-19 Symposium
      • CSR Events
    • Our Team
  • Contact