Columbia Science Review
  • Home
  • About
    • Executive Board
    • Editorial Board
  • Blog
  • Events
    • 2022-2023
    • 2021-2022
    • 2020-2021
    • 2019-2020
    • 2018-2019
    • 2017-2018
    • 2016-2017
  • Publications
  • COVID-19 Public Hub
    • Interviews >
      • Biology of COVID-19
      • Public Health
      • Technology & Data
    • Frontline Stories >
      • Healthcare Workers
      • Global Health
      • Volunteer Efforts
    • Resources & Links >
      • FAQ's
      • Resource Hubs
      • Student Opportunities
      • Podcasts & Graphics
      • Mental Health Resources
      • Twitter Feeds
      • BLM Resources
    • Columbia Events >
      • Campus Events
      • CUMC COVID-19 Symposium
      • CSR Events
    • Our Team
  • Contact

An Evolutionary Exploration of Animal Sexuality

4/13/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
Written by Julia Zeh
Edited by Olivia Ghosh

Does homosexuality exist in animals other than humans? Yes, and no.

From the perspective of Darwinian evolution, homosexuality is a puzzling concept. According to Charles Darwin, natural selection works to promote fitness in the sense of increasing reproductive output. In order for certain traits to evolve, they must be adaptive, meaning the benefits to an animal’s reproductive success must outweigh the costs. But from this standpoint, how can homosexuality evolve? By definition homosexuality has no reproductive output and takes away from the reproductive success of the individual and the species, because homosexual sex cannot result in offspring.

Yet, same-sex relationships still exist in nature, and even though they don’t lead directly to an individual passing on its genes, they still must have some adaptive value. In fact, homosexuality is not even a rare trait; so far over 450 species have been identified which exhibit homosexuality. So what is the adaptive value? Why aren’t all relationships heterosexual in the animal kingdom?

The answer lies in the benefits of homosexual relationships, including benefits to social relationships and hierarchies, pleasure, and parental care. These benefits are exhibited in species such as the Laysan albatross, bonobos, bottlenose dolphins, domestic sheep, and humans.

Laysan albatrosses usually mate for life, but these mating pairs are not always male-female pairings. One third of pair bonds are between two females and these females try to mate with each other and care for their offspring together. Males do still mate with females, so offspring are produced, but males don’t usually stick around. This is where the female-female pair bond is useful; the females take care of their babies together with equal responsibility. Males provide no parental care, so having two female parents is actually adaptive and beneficial because it helps with parental care and offspring fitness.

As opposed to the albatross, both bonobos and bottlenose dolphins use sex as a strategy for social communication. Both of these species are social mammals with complex social relationships and, as with many other species, sex is used in maintaining these complex relationships. In bottlenose dolphins, homosexual sex is exhibited in both males and females and it is used to form strong social bonds. Bonobos are similar. One of the most peaceful species on the planet, these animals use sex as a peacekeeping strategy, and the groups with more instances of homosexual sex are more peaceful. Bonobos establish matriarchal societies in which social status is established through sexual relations, both for the dominant females as well as for subordinate males. In addition, this species replaces aggression with sex, and mating behaviors are observed in individuals both very young and old, as well as between male-female pairs, male-male pairs, and female-female pairs.

In domestic sheep, on the other hand, some individuals never form female-male pairs. Certain males mate with another male for life, showing no interest in females, even when they are ready to breed. This behavior likely evolved because the gene that promotes homosexuality in males also benefits reproductive output in females. For example, this same gene could increase fertility in females, thus making the reproductive benefits to the species greater than the costs of a few males who never reproduce. This link between genes that increase fertility in females and homosexuality in males has been proposed, but the specifics are still unclear.

But there is also a reason to say that no species of wild animal is truly homosexual other than humans. Although there are male domestic sheep who never mate with females, spending their entire lives only interested in males, this is likely due to artificial selection by humans. This behavior has only been observed in domestic sheep, not wild sheep, and it is likely that humans bred their sheep to be more fertile. This increased the frequency of homosexuality, so it is not necessarily a natural occurrence. All of the examples described previously, other than domestic sheep, are technically bisexual. They all have one main thing in common: despite the presence of homosexuality, all individuals still mate with the opposite sex at some point and produce offspring.
​
So why are humans the only wild animal species with truly homosexual individuals? The answer is we don’t know. Research has been done on how hormones and brain circuitry may cause homosexuality, but as for its evolution and the reason why it hasn’t evolved in other animals, the answer is not yet clear. But what is clear is that homosexual sex and pair bonds are both natural and actually quite common, and there are a huge number of species which, although they do not exhibit true homosexuality, do exhibit bisexuality.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Artificial Intelligence
    Halloween 2022

    Archives

    November 2022
    October 2022
    June 2022
    January 2022
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    July 2009
    May 2009

Columbia Science Review
© COPYRIGHT 2022. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Photos used under Creative Commons from driver Photographer, BrevisPhotography, digitalbob8, Rennett Stowe, Kristine Paulus
  • Home
  • About
    • Executive Board
    • Editorial Board
  • Blog
  • Events
    • 2022-2023
    • 2021-2022
    • 2020-2021
    • 2019-2020
    • 2018-2019
    • 2017-2018
    • 2016-2017
  • Publications
  • COVID-19 Public Hub
    • Interviews >
      • Biology of COVID-19
      • Public Health
      • Technology & Data
    • Frontline Stories >
      • Healthcare Workers
      • Global Health
      • Volunteer Efforts
    • Resources & Links >
      • FAQ's
      • Resource Hubs
      • Student Opportunities
      • Podcasts & Graphics
      • Mental Health Resources
      • Twitter Feeds
      • BLM Resources
    • Columbia Events >
      • Campus Events
      • CUMC COVID-19 Symposium
      • CSR Events
    • Our Team
  • Contact