Columbia Science Review
  • Home
  • About
    • Executive Board
    • Editorial Board
  • Blog
  • Events
    • 2022-2023
    • 2021-2022
    • 2020-2021
    • 2019-2020
    • 2018-2019
    • 2017-2018
    • 2016-2017
  • Publications
  • COVID-19 Public Hub
    • Interviews >
      • Biology of COVID-19
      • Public Health
      • Technology & Data
    • Frontline Stories >
      • Healthcare Workers
      • Global Health
      • Volunteer Efforts
    • Resources & Links >
      • FAQ's
      • Resource Hubs
      • Student Opportunities
      • Podcasts & Graphics
      • Mental Health Resources
      • Twitter Feeds
      • BLM Resources
    • Columbia Events >
      • Campus Events
      • CUMC COVID-19 Symposium
      • CSR Events
    • Our Team
  • Contact

Expanding the DNA Alphabet

4/30/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Jenna Everard
​

The origin and evolution of life as we know it has long been a topic of debate within the scientific community. At the center of that puzzle lies deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA — the molecule of inheritance that defines life, determining the structures, functions, and capabilities of various organisms.

DNA is composed of four nitrogenous bases, Adenine (A), Thymine (T), Cytosine (C), and Guanine (G), all of which are attached to a molecular backbone of alternating deoxyribose sugars and phosphate groups. In order to form the notorious double helix structure of DNA, a structure that looks like a twisted ladder, hydrogen bonds form between the bases, joining the two backbones together. The rules for these bond formations are relatively strict: C always pairs with G and A always pairs with T. In this manner, the genetic code for life is formed, with different sequences of bases forming different genes that encode different proteins, which determine the various features and functions of living creatures. 


As the capabilities of genetic technologies grow, genetic engineering has become a popular approach used for the development of treatments for diseases such as cancer. Traditionally, genetic engineering involves the alteration of genes, such as inserting different ones, removing undesired ones, or changing their expression. While these methods all alter pre-existing DNA, new approaches have begun to explore creating novel genes by adding letters to the DNA alphabet.

In 1962, Alexander Rich first proposed the idea of unnatural base pairs (UBPs), or bases of DNA synthesized in a lab. However, it was not until 2009 that Floyd Romesberg’s lab created the first UBP, labeled X and Y, that could be efficiently amplified and transcribed into proteins. In 2014, Romesberg co-founded Synthorx, a company that strives to use an expanded DNA alphabet made up of six bases rather than the traditional four to develop novel proteins, which they call Synthorins. With their proprietary semi-synthetic bacteria, they are capable of efficiently producing these proteins, and they aim to use them to provide better treatments for cancer and autoimmune disorders.

Synthorx’s first product, THOR-707, has recently been approved for its first in-human clinical trials. It will be both the first Synthorin-based product designed and entered in clinics. THOR-707 is predicted to be an efficient tumor suppressor as it prevents the binding of certain signalling molecules, which increases the activity of cells linked with favorable cancer prognoses while decreasing the activity of cells that suppress immune responses.

Other scientists have followed in Romesberg’s direction of creating UBPs, but not necessarily with the same goals in mind. Just last year, Dr. Steven Benner created an expanded DNA alphabet with 8 letters! In his alphabet, in addition to the normal base pairs, there are 4 UBP’s that form two additional base pairs. His new base pairs fit neatly among normal base pairs and can be easily read by enzymes to make RNA, the molecule that precedes protein formation. In addition to its potential use in diagnosing and treating diseases, Benner’s research to develop his “Hachimoji DNA” begins to hypothesize types of molecules that might sustain extraterrestrial life forms.

Both Romesberg and Benner have achieved remarkable discoveries, expanding on what we have previously considered the fundamental code for life in order to explore possibilities of  new lifeforms. Though there is a wide range of useful applications for their respective DNA alphabets, all seem to probe at the basic question: why did life evolve the way that it did? While many have assumed for centuries that a part of the explanation was that the four natural bases of DNA were the only ones that functioned properly in genes, Romesberg and Benner have shown that this is not the case. Their research reveals DNA could have had more bases, but doesn’t, and we are still wondering why.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Artificial Intelligence
    Halloween 2022

    Archives

    November 2022
    October 2022
    June 2022
    January 2022
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    July 2009
    May 2009

Columbia Science Review
© COPYRIGHT 2022. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Photos used under Creative Commons from driver Photographer, BrevisPhotography, digitalbob8, Rennett Stowe, Kristine Paulus
  • Home
  • About
    • Executive Board
    • Editorial Board
  • Blog
  • Events
    • 2022-2023
    • 2021-2022
    • 2020-2021
    • 2019-2020
    • 2018-2019
    • 2017-2018
    • 2016-2017
  • Publications
  • COVID-19 Public Hub
    • Interviews >
      • Biology of COVID-19
      • Public Health
      • Technology & Data
    • Frontline Stories >
      • Healthcare Workers
      • Global Health
      • Volunteer Efforts
    • Resources & Links >
      • FAQ's
      • Resource Hubs
      • Student Opportunities
      • Podcasts & Graphics
      • Mental Health Resources
      • Twitter Feeds
      • BLM Resources
    • Columbia Events >
      • Campus Events
      • CUMC COVID-19 Symposium
      • CSR Events
    • Our Team
  • Contact