Columbia Science Review
  • Home
  • About
    • Executive Board
    • Editorial Board
  • Blog
  • Events
    • 2022-2023
    • 2021-2022
    • 2020-2021
    • 2019-2020
    • 2018-2019
    • 2017-2018
    • 2016-2017
  • Publications
  • COVID-19 Public Hub
    • Interviews >
      • Biology of COVID-19
      • Public Health
      • Technology & Data
    • Frontline Stories >
      • Healthcare Workers
      • Global Health
      • Volunteer Efforts
    • Resources & Links >
      • FAQ's
      • Resource Hubs
      • Student Opportunities
      • Podcasts & Graphics
      • Mental Health Resources
      • Twitter Feeds
      • BLM Resources
    • Columbia Events >
      • Campus Events
      • CUMC COVID-19 Symposium
      • CSR Events
    • Our Team
  • Contact

Glacial Melting: A Slippery Slope

5/26/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Jenna Everard​

Covering around 10 percent of the Earth’s surface, glaciers are an important resource for humans. Not only do their movements provide glacial till, which are sediments derived from glacial erosion that provide fertile soil, but glaciers also store 69 percent of the world’s freshwater supply. Although glaciers’ fluctuating masses have allowed scientists to begin quantifying the impacts of anthropogenic climate change, there is still much we do not know about these fascinating, massive bodies of ice.

Studying glaciers can be extremely hazardous: in a process called
iceberg calving, chunks of ice can break off from the edge of a glacier, causing unpredictable dangers such as falling ice masses and turbulent waves. This danger is even greater when conducting scientific studies about climate change and sea level rise—in order to investigate how ocean warming causes ice sheets to melt, it is essential to observe the physical points at which the ocean meets the ice sheets. In other words, once must go directly beneath the towering cliffs!


Luckily, innovative and safe ways to do just that are being devised. As announced late last year, researchers from Rutgers University have been deploying robotic kayaks to survey the LeConte Glacier in Alaska, where dangerous conditions prevent in-person data collection. Programmed to get as close to the towering cliffs as possible, these kayaks measure how much glacial freshwater melts into the ocean from beneath the glaciers, a phenomenon known as “ambient meltwater intrusions.” Due to the prevalent hazards, ambient melting hasn’t been well studied, and its incorporation into models that simulate glacial melting has only been estimated. These traditional models assume that the impact of ambient melting is minor in comparison to the impact of discharge-driven melting (melting that occurs at the surface through processes such as the aforementioned iceberg calving). However, based on new robotic data, researchers have challenged the previous ambient plume melting rates of 0.05 vertical meters per day: their new findings indicate a rate of about 5 vertical meters per day. This is 100 times higher than anticipated.

The development of new technologies such as autonomous kayaks couldn’t have come at a better time. Already, automated robots are being called for their next mission—Thwaites glacier, or Antarctica’s so-called “Doomsday Glacier,” located on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. This glacier is larger than the state of Florida, with a colossal 75-mile front of ice. As a result of the Thwaites glacier’s historic trends of high ice loss, at approximately 50 billion tons per year, satellites detected a massive cavity, equating to the loss of about 14 billion tons of ice, beneath the Thwaites glacier in February 2020. This further contributes to the unstable configuration of the glacier, bringing the possibility of a glacial collapse closer to reality.

While such a collapse would inevitably raise sea levels, and impact 40% of the world’s population who live near coasts, researchers assert that this isn’t the only concern. Even small amounts of glacial melting have the potential to bring about much larger changes in the global climate. Our oceans play a major role in regulating the Earth’s climate, distributing heat through vital processes such as the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), a flow which brings warm water from the Gulf of Mexico to Europe. As glaciers melt, this circulation is slowing down, causing colder winters and warmer summers in the North Atlantic. These changing temperatures disturb nutrient cycles in the ocean and, in turn, disrupt the biological functions of various marine organisms. They also initiate a positive feedback mechanism, in which raised temperatures cause further glacial melting, which slows the AMOC further, which then raises temperatures even more.

If we are to address these concerns, it is necessary to further understand the processes that are causing these glaciers to melt. Whether that be through the use of robotic kayaks or squads of sensor-equipped seals, there is no doubt that modern technological advances and creative ingenuities will lead the way. Although the Thwaites Glacier’s Twitter Page ominuously warns that it’s “COMING SOON to sea level near you,” and although such changes may be inevitable, by furthering our understanding of underwater melting, we can reassess the impacts of sea-level rise and refine our strategies for responding to and minimizing the harm of this imminent future.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Artificial Intelligence
    Halloween 2022

    Archives

    November 2022
    October 2022
    June 2022
    January 2022
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    July 2009
    May 2009

Columbia Science Review
© COPYRIGHT 2022. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Photos used under Creative Commons from driver Photographer, BrevisPhotography, digitalbob8, Rennett Stowe, Kristine Paulus
  • Home
  • About
    • Executive Board
    • Editorial Board
  • Blog
  • Events
    • 2022-2023
    • 2021-2022
    • 2020-2021
    • 2019-2020
    • 2018-2019
    • 2017-2018
    • 2016-2017
  • Publications
  • COVID-19 Public Hub
    • Interviews >
      • Biology of COVID-19
      • Public Health
      • Technology & Data
    • Frontline Stories >
      • Healthcare Workers
      • Global Health
      • Volunteer Efforts
    • Resources & Links >
      • FAQ's
      • Resource Hubs
      • Student Opportunities
      • Podcasts & Graphics
      • Mental Health Resources
      • Twitter Feeds
      • BLM Resources
    • Columbia Events >
      • Campus Events
      • CUMC COVID-19 Symposium
      • CSR Events
    • Our Team
  • Contact