Columbia Science Review
  • Home
  • About
    • Our Team
  • Blog
  • Events
    • 2022-2023
    • 2021-2022
    • 2020-2021
    • 2019-2020
    • 2018-2019
    • 2017-2018
    • 2016-2017
  • Publications
  • COVID-19 Public Hub
    • Interviews >
      • Biology of COVID-19
      • Public Health
      • Technology & Data
    • Frontline Stories >
      • Healthcare Workers
      • Global Health
      • Volunteer Efforts
    • Resources & Links >
      • FAQ's
      • Resource Hubs
      • Student Opportunities
      • Podcasts & Graphics
      • Mental Health Resources
      • Twitter Feeds
      • BLM Resources
    • Columbia Events >
      • Campus Events
      • CUMC COVID-19 Symposium
      • CSR Events
    • Our Team
  • Contact

Neuroscience’s Take on the Supernatural: Are Near Death Experiences Real?

1/18/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Aditya Nair

It’s a tale that seems as old as history. Those among us who have come very close to dying report extraordinarily vivid visions involving some combination of seeing the dead, passing through a tunnel, feeling dissociated from the body, and extreme emotional states among many other phenomena collectively referred to as near death experiences (NDE’s). These experiences tend to be relatively similar in nature from patient to patient in their general characteristics, and they are usually perceived with an extremely high degree of realism, leading many sufferers to describe them as life-defining experiences often tied to religious nirvana or enlightenment. A surprisingly large proportion of Americans report having had NDE’s- around 3%, a figure that represents 40-50% of all people who have come close to clinical death.

Despite the supernatural element of most NDE’s, many neuroscientists believe that NDE’s are largely explainable by current neuroscience in corporeal terms. Rather than being evidence for an afterlife or supernatural forces, NDE’s are more likely to be a hyper-realistic delusion brought about by abnormal patterns of neural firings from a loss of blood flow to certain parts of the brain as the body goes into emergency mode in the minutes and seconds right before death.

The first piece of evidence is the non-exclusivity of NDE’s to dying patients. It turns out that the conditions necessary for a NDE don’t necessarily involve imminent death, lending support to the notion that NDE’s are purely a result of abnormal brain chemistry. For example, one patient who lost consciousness due to low blood glucose levels reported experiencing an NDE upon waking up. In fact, a prospective study of NDE’s found that over half of NDE’s were experienced in non-imminently life threatening conditions.

Furthermore, many of the “classic” characteristics of an NDE can be experimentally demonstrated in studies that have little to do with death. For example, one commonly reported component of a NDE is an out of body experience, or OBE, in which the patient feels as if he or she is “floating” outside of their own bodies. Not being unique to NDE’s, OBE’s are experienced by people even during perfect physical and psychological health, sometimes as a common side effect of deep sleep. Neuroscientist Olaf Blanke showed that stimulation of the right temporopareital junction could elicit a strong OBE, demonstrating that disruption of sensory integration in that area could bring about the feeling of an OBE. It’s very possible that, when faced with physiological stress, sensory integration in this area is similarly disrupted, which results in the perception of an OBE just like in an experimental setting.

Many NDE patients also report that they travel through a characteristic “tunnel of light” during their NDE’s. However, this symptom too is well studied as a neurological phenomenon, usually in conjunction with lowered availability of blood in the retina. The sensation of passing through a tunnel of light is often reported in military airplane pilots, who are subjected to extremely strong forces that may drain blood from the head and eyes. The tunneling sensation is also often reported by glaucoma patients, who are victim to constricted blood vessels in the eye.
​
Although there are several other key characteristics of NDE’s that are also explainable scientifically, I have chosen for the sake of brevity to exclude them from this discussion. While some use the similarities across NDE’s to argue that NDE’s are the psychological manifestation of a human connection with “supernatural” forces, scientists respond that the consistency of NDE symptoms demonstrate that natural phenomena produce predictable physiological effects. Although the debate surrounding NDE’s will surely rage on in the theological and philosophical world, NDE’s are coming closer and closer to being entirely resolved as a scientific question.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Artificial Intelligence
    Halloween 2022
    Winter 2022-2023

    Archives

    April 2024
    January 2024
    February 2023
    November 2022
    October 2022
    June 2022
    January 2022
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    July 2009
    May 2009

Columbia Science Review
© COPYRIGHT 2022. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Photos from driver Photographer, BrevisPhotography, digitalbob8, Rennett Stowe, Kristine Paulus, Tony Webster, CodonAUG, Tony Webster, spurekar, europeanspaceagency, Christoph Scholz, verchmarco, rockindave1, robynmack96, Homedust, The Nutrition Insider
  • Home
  • About
    • Our Team
  • Blog
  • Events
    • 2022-2023
    • 2021-2022
    • 2020-2021
    • 2019-2020
    • 2018-2019
    • 2017-2018
    • 2016-2017
  • Publications
  • COVID-19 Public Hub
    • Interviews >
      • Biology of COVID-19
      • Public Health
      • Technology & Data
    • Frontline Stories >
      • Healthcare Workers
      • Global Health
      • Volunteer Efforts
    • Resources & Links >
      • FAQ's
      • Resource Hubs
      • Student Opportunities
      • Podcasts & Graphics
      • Mental Health Resources
      • Twitter Feeds
      • BLM Resources
    • Columbia Events >
      • Campus Events
      • CUMC COVID-19 Symposium
      • CSR Events
    • Our Team
  • Contact